ethan1134 wrote:Who are you talking to?
oh... oops that was SUPOSED to be to the first poster of the forum. My bad
by Luke Anime » Mon May 26, 2008 4:45 am
ethan1134 wrote:Who are you talking to?
by ethan1134 » Mon May 26, 2008 2:02 pm
by Vesher » Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:42 pm
by Itsjake1 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:13 pm
Vesher wrote:This has gone on way too far. There's some valid arguments for each side of the case but everyone continuously makes themselves look like idiots by throwing a bunch of false claims in their post without looking it up.
Marijuana -is- worse for your lungs then cigarettes ... that's only the case because it is extremely rare for it to be filtered, thus creating more tar buildup in your lungs by a long shot. The only way for it to be filtered is via joint, it is not filtered when you take a rip from a bong or any such instrument. It is not very common that people put filters in their joints that compare to the industry.
There -is- an increased risk of depression, suicidal thoughts and schizophrenia as a result of marijuana use. This has also been proven
("You must have 1 posts before you can post URL's/Links."
unfortunately I can't post links. But, simply go on Google and search 'Marijuana Schizophrenia' without the quotes and you'll get tonnes of pages worth of evidence)
Any ties someone draws between two drugs are pointless. Each drug is its own and cannot be compared. There are far too many factors to be considered that even saying 'they are kind of the same' is not true. Just because you feel the same when you're drunk and/or high does not mean you body is in the same situation.
As much as it may not be addicting, addiction can derive from anywhere. Addiction is the result of relief and enjoyment that can come from a craving of nicotine to joy, or being relaxed. Even the joy/happiness of obtaining a new candle to add to a collection can form an addiction.
It is true that you cannot overdose on marijuana either. A study proved that it would be impossible to consume enough THC in the time span necessary to cause an overdose.
"Tests performed on mice have shown that the ratio of cannabinoids (the chemicals in marijuana that make you high) necessary for overdose to the amount necessary for intoxication is 40,000:1.
For comparison's sake, that ratio for alcohol is generally between 4:1 and 10:1."
Marijuana stimulates certain brain cells, however, it does -not- cause any damage to your brain cells. Thus, it does not cause brain damage. However it does impair your short term memory while intoxicated. Studies have shown that in chronic/heavy marijuana users impairment still remains after 6-12 weeks following abstinence.
I honestly don't care if it stays legal or not. Not anything I can do or say will effect what the governments views on marijuana and it's legalization. If they intend to legalize it, it will happen in their own time and whenever they feel comfortable about it. Nothing you say or do will have a severe impact on the laws, and this discussion really isn't going to change a thing. Sorry to destroy any passion within this thread, but even considering the fantastical '4:20 protest' which has gone of for -years- in ratio to the change in political views towards the drug. There's no realistic impact potheads can have on the government, especially considering how ill educated they are. Next time you go to a 4:20 protest, ask the people around you what they're protesting. I bet some of them won't even know that it's a protest.
Thanks for reading in its entirety if you did.
by demonkingjj » Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:54 pm
Kato wrote:think about it for a long while. if it gets legalized, it will become just as corrupt as the tobacco industry. tobacco is a gigantic industry and tobacco cigarrettes kill. why? because the big money-makers dilute it SOOOOooooOOOO much with carcinogens and other shit you shouldn't be smoking.
i used to be for legalization too--but we'll be seeing "Marlboro Smooth Joints Lite Low Cal Zero" behind the counter and it won't even get you high, probably. it will just give you cancer for an overpriced half-high.
unless you want the theoretical marijuana industry to become like the tobacco industry, you'll be against legalization.
by stickyicky420 » Wed May 27, 2009 1:48 pm
Marijauna can lead to deppression and then suicide, sorry but im happy the way I am now.
by ethan1134 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:41 pm
by brosef » Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:54 am
by cameraboirzu » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:52 pm
by cameraboirzu » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:53 pm
demonkingjj wrote:Kato wrote:think about it for a long while. if it gets legalized, it will become just as corrupt as the tobacco industry. tobacco is a gigantic industry and tobacco cigarrettes kill. why? because the big money-makers dilute it SOOOOooooOOOO much with carcinogens and other shit you shouldn't be smoking.
i used to be for legalization too--but we'll be seeing "Marlboro Smooth Joints Lite Low Cal Zero" behind the counter and it won't even get you high, probably. it will just give you cancer for an overpriced half-high.
unless you want the theoretical marijuana industry to become like the tobacco industry, you'll be against legalization.
Honestly, that's like pretty much word-for-word what I was gonna say.
+1
Think about it. Can you imagine how much money the Tobacco companies make from cigarettes? Now don't forget, Marijuana is more expensive and more addictive (although maybe not by alot). They'll see this and realize they can make ever more money from this.
I'd be for legalization, but people will OBVIOUSLY abuse it.
by wafcake » Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:46 pm
xLAMExOx wrote:Who ever thinks that it should be legalized is LAME!
Marijauna can lead to deppression and then suicide, sorry but im happy the way I am now.
Alcohol and Marijauna are not the same.
Personally I think that it should stay ILLEGAL and cigs should be banned. The problem with your idea of only using it "responsibly" is that maybe you will but someone else wont! then something is gonna go wrong...
So it's fine how it is!
by whatpants » Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:09 pm
by 420master » Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:23 pm
whatpants wrote:I think it should be legalized, too. Some people find it relieves stress, and in a society like todays, we need all the stress relievers we can get. I for one am prone to stress headaches, and every now and then when the pain killers I take just don't touch it, I light up.
I honestly think it should be seen with the same responsibility that alcohol is seen with-- just like alcohol, you can become addicted, and just like alcohol, you know your limit.
Though I also understand why they haven't legalized it. People tend to... well, when given responsibility, people either rise up to the challenge or they abuse it. Here in England, the legal drinking age is 18, but I can honestly say that at the age of twelve, I was served alcohol and although at the time I felt pretty cool, it was pretty bad.
I think that perhaps marijuana shouldn't be as easy to come across as alcohol, and I certainly think there should be an age limit of at least 16.
On a completely unrelated topic, I think they're planning on raising the drinking level to 21, which would suck.
by whatpants » Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:32 pm
420master wrote:
ha 21... thats the way its been in the states forever
by cameraboirzu » Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:28 pm
whatpants wrote:I honestly think it should be seen with the same responsibility that alcohol is seen with-- just like alcohol, you can become addicted, and just like alcohol, you know your limit.